POV's Documentary Blog

The Cautious Critic

I am a bit reserved when it comes to making grand declarations about the state of things in documentary. Call me a “curmudgeon.” Call me a “stick in the mud.” Call me whatever you like so long as it is polite.

Earlier this month, a Slate headline declared, “We’re Living in a Golden Age of Documentary Filmmaking.” The writer wisely cited Steve James in this quote, “I feel and have felt for a long time that we are in a golden age of documentary filmmaking.” And overall, I agree with what the author asserts in that story following James’ comment.

But then came this story: The Golden Age of Documentaries: What’s the Best Doc of the Last 5 Years?. The story featured a poll asking readers to choose from the following titles:

(Here are the results, if you’re curious.)

It’s these kinds of polls that make me twitchy. They raise more questions than they answer, ultimately. Why the last five years? Why not the last eight, 10, or 22? Why these titles, which cover such a range of subjects? Trouble the Water and Taxi to the Dark Side are both haunting pieces, but do they belong alongside the portraits of Man on Wire or Marwencol, the stomach-turning of Food, Inc., or the deep hope of Anvil?

Why draw only on mainstream publications and profits lists for items to include on the list?

And why do only five of the listed 30 titles feature women makers in the directing role? Why do even less than that feature stories about women?

While these polls might be fun, they really don’t contribute much to overall understanding of documentary today. This one, like so many others, just reinforces the dominance of the mainstream discussions about the form and overlooks the immense variety that is happening out there.

This post first appeared on DocumentarySite.com.

Get more documentary film news and features: Subscribe to POV’s documentary blog, like POV on Facebook or follow us on Twitter @povdocs.