Filmmaker Maite Maite Alberdi discusses the making of the film, Tea Time.
Tell us about your film, Tea Time.
Maite Alberdi: Teatime is a film about friendship, a film about the different ways to experience and live love, it's also a film about intimate confessions between women, about a new model for old age in which people are totally active and it is also a film about death.
It's a film that tells a story of a group of five elderly girlfriends who have been getting together for tea once a month for the last sixty years. At the table, they talk about their past, their most intimate feelings, their pains and they also trying to analyze the present proving that they are still up to date with reality. In spite of having different personalities and biographies which always generate internal quarrels, in the long run they are long life friends so fights don't last very long.
We are facing a new kind of old age in which old people are up to date, they are not helpless, of course they are going to die but making the most every moment, an active, vital, and I believe it is world wide to spread this attitude about all in this generation that have more preconceived ideas about old age.
I understand that friends are the people that accompany you and not the people that are more like you. In this film there is also an approach to understanding why this conservative generation thinks the way it does. Those women lived through a period of radical historical changes. When they became adults they didn't have the right to vote, and for example today they have to speak and discuss about same sex marriage, they have had to adapt to so many things despite having had a radically conservative upbringing. The film I think that help us to understand why this group of women thinks the way they do without censoring them from beforehand or seeing them from our preconceived ideas.
Discuss the making of the film.
Maite Alberdi: Well the shooting took five years. Once a month we went to shoot the monthly tea and after the shooting we sat down with them at the table and ate the leftovers, which were very few, but before filming I had already spent my whole life with them. This is my grandmother and her group of friends so I have always felt very close to their conversations. Actually I never really thought about making a film about them until the day that I release my first short film. And my grandmother has always been a big fan of mine but she told me that she couldn't make it to the first screening because she had her teatime with her friends at the same day and I get furious. I had to ask myself why she preferred her friends over me. That's when I realized how important friendship was and I started this project.
From the very beginning I saw this project as an aesthetic challenge for me. I knew that I wanted to build it and shoot it using only close-ups for different reasons but first and the most important because I really wanted the spectator to be like one more guest sitting here at the table with the characters. I wanted to build an intimate, observation documentary when we are looking at each other up close. On the other hand, for me the off frame played a fundamental role because the relation these women had and that they… any group of friends for that matter is often centered on everything that is not said. For example in the way she looked at her, in the expression she had on her face, in what wasn't said. So really those subtle reactions are often the base of an interaction and often say so much more than any dialogue and it could only be conveyed by a close-up.
For example, the reaction that you can see when one of the friends' face when she realized that her friend has Alzheimer's and forget things, seems to me much more powerful than having the camera on the person who is trying to speak but keeps forgetting, forgetting what she wants to say, because these reactions transmit the dramatic quality of the situation and the depth of that friendship relation. In addition there was a pragmatic aspect as well, all the houses were different and changing from one afternoon to the next one but we need to generate a continuity of the style so each conversation has content units and although it seems to be only one moment and in time and space, but it really wasn't.
What was your biggest challenge?
Maite Alberdi: The biggest challenge I faced in making this film was being constant and patient. For me, filming this documentary is an exercise in patience, waiting for things to happen in reality without hurrying or pushing them, trusting that if one chooses the places and situations well, they will provide what do you need. But the right time is more up to life than up to the director. I think it's complex to impose a time frame in the character's development. In this film, I knew that I wanted to portray the last years of this ritual but I didn't really know exactly how long this was going to take. We filming once a month for five years in a row. Films have to tell stories and real life stories don't happen over night. That's the challenge for a documentary in general and for this film in particular. Leaving the reality on these characters however long it may take to tell their story and have it move forward. Have things happens, that's the journey.
What was your greatest satisfaction?
Maite Alberdi: My greatest satisfaction in this film is that something which started as a personal attraction to my grandmother and her friends, was able to become a total universal and transversal story that people could relate to anywhere in the world. I believe that cinema must have something that seems contradictory, it must involve the individual and the universal at the same time. Unique characters or singular stories with universal emotions that touch us all. They had all this beyond my personal relation with them. Additionally, as a director, I am proud of the fact that in spite of film having a radical style — we use only close-ups — it is not an experimental film. It's a film that reach out to a broad audience and I was able to do this without betraying the outer style that I wanted to give it. When you have a powerful story with unique and universal characters, there are liberties in style that you can take and one has to take advantage of that. You have to leave the conventional behind to have a voice as the director in film's language. For me, the point of view is not only in the content but it is mainly in the way you film.